| 217,14 → 217,6 |
|---|
| ; Note: this still isn't 100% correct, because two IRQs can fire simultaneously, |
| ; the better way would be to find the correct IRQ, but I don't know how to do |
| ; this in that case. |
| ; Also, [fdc_irq_func], [irq14_func], [irq15_func] could process interrupt |
| ; but do not return whether they did it, so just ignore IRQs 6, 14, 15. |
| cmp ebp, 6 |
| jz .fail |
| cmp ebp, 14 |
| jz .fail |
| cmp ebp, 15 |
| jz .fail |
| push ebp |
| xor ebp, ebp |
| .try_other_irqs: |
| 238,9 → 230,6 |
|---|
| je .try_next_irq |
| cmp [ebx+IRQH.num_ints], 0 |
| jne .try_next_irq |
| ; keyboard handler acknowledges everything |
| cmp [ebx+IRQH.handler], irq1 |
| jz .try_next_irq |
| push [ebx+IRQH.data] |
| call [ebx+IRQH.handler] |
| pop ecx |
| 252,7 → 241,6 |
|---|
| jb .try_other_irqs |
| pop ebp |
| |
| .fail: |
| inc [irq_failed+ebp*4] |
| .exit: |
| mov [check_idle_semaphore], 5 |